Corneal ectasia: screening, risk factors, and preoperative assessment
A surgeon-focused guide to corneal ectasia, keratoconus susceptibility, postoperative ectasia, topography, tomography, and preoperative refractive-surgery screening.
Open moduleSurgeon education
A structured, evidence-linked technical guide to corneal ectasia screening for ophthalmologists and refractive surgeons.
Curriculum
Each module names its evidence limits and links to primary literature or manufacturer documentation. No educational page calculates a patient result.
A surgeon-focused guide to corneal ectasia, keratoconus susceptibility, postoperative ectasia, topography, tomography, and preoperative refractive-surgery screening.
Open moduleHow refractive surgeons can organize Pentacam curvature, elevation, pachymetry, and quality information without interchanging sources.
Open moduleAn evidence-bounded guide to the Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display, Final BAD-D, and its component deviation indices.
Open moduleA practical guide to ISV, IVA, KI, CKI, IHA, IHD, and Rmin as pattern descriptors rather than stand-alone diagnoses.
Open moduleThe variables, evidence base, scope, and limitations of the Randleman ERSS in preoperative LASIK screening.
Open moduleA careful introduction to the NICE cumulative risk concept, its elevation-tomography basis, and CER-AI's explicit implementation boundary.
Open moduleA factor-by-factor guide to the Practical Subjective Scoring System and the procedure-specific way CER-AI evaluates its automated findings.
Open moduleHow to describe asymmetric bow-tie, inferior or superior steepening, skewed axes, elevation, and pachymetric patterns without overcalling a diagnosis.
Open moduleEducational review of residual stromal bed, percent tissue altered, ablation depth, flap thickness, and why safety checks remain separate from ectasia scores.
Open moduleDe-identified teaching archetypes showing how surgeons can reconcile concordant, discordant, incomplete, and procedure-dependent ectasia-risk evidence.
Open moduleHow CER-AI separates educational content, structured assessment, source provenance, independent risk pathways, and procedural safety.
Open moduleA structured sequence for learning corneal ectasia screening, Pentacam interpretation, risk systems, and procedure-specific safety.
Open modulePhysician presentation
Review the program logic, canonical data sources, independent risk channels, and procedure-specific decision workflow in a 20-slide deck.
Worked examples
Follow how source inputs become independent risk pathways, safety checks, and a structured report.
Synthetic example in which all four risk pathways and independent tissue-safety checks are complete.
Open worked caseSynthetic LASIK example showing why CER-AI does not hide discordance inside one average score.
Open worked caseSynthetic case in which signed I-S establishes ERSS inferior steepening while confirmed SRAX >20° independently creates a PS3 High factor.
Open worked caseSynthetic example showing why missing tomography is not interpreted as normal.
Open worked caseEvidence library
Use the clinical evidence map for pathway-level interpretation and the searchable registry for the complete bibliography.
Questions
Read concise answers and see how the planned assistant remains separated from patient-specific assessment.