Education and assessment are separate

The Learning Center explains published concepts and clinical reasoning. The protected CER-AI application performs structured, patient-specific assessment. Reading an educational page never calculates, changes, or substitutes for a clinical result.

Independent pathways

CER-AI keeps ERSS, Final BAD-D, CER-AI-adapted NICE, and PS3 visible as distinct assessment channels. It does not present them as one externally validated proprietary probability. Agreement and disagreement remain available for surgeon review.

Source provenance and uncertainty

Decision-critical extracted values remain tied to defined source fields. Missing, unreadable, conflicting, and surgeon-completed data are not intended to disappear inside a final label. This supports auditability and reduces silent source interchange.

Validation language

Publications cited by CER-AI support specific variables, systems, or background concepts. They do not automatically validate CER-AI as a complete product. CER-AI-specific diagnostic performance, clinical outcome, superiority, or regulatory claims require their own supporting evidence.

How independent pathways become the final result

ConditionFinal dispositionPriority
Any STOP-DEFER driverSTOP-DEFEROverrides all other results
No stop, but critical data incompleteASSESSMENT INCOMPLETEMissingness is never converted to PASS
Four systems complete; 0 or 1 CAUTIONPASSIndividual caution remains visible in its section
Four systems complete; 2 CAUTIONPASS WITH CAUTIONBoth drivers are listed
Four systems complete; 3 or 4 CAUTIONCAUTIONAll drivers are listed
Independent non-system cautionCAUTIONRetains its own authority

The four counted systems are ERSS, Final BAD-D, NICE, and PS3. Tissue and clinical-eligibility stops remain independent; bilateral aggregation preserves the worse eye and does not add caution counts across eyes.

What the structured report carries

Report blockContentWhy it matters
ERSSFive component rows, points, total, topography category, dispositionAuditable weighted score
NICEFour inputs, points, total, category, dispositionAuditable cumulative score
PS3Every factor, exact finding, Moderate/High counts, procedure dispositionShows why a procedure is allowed, deferred, or incomplete
BAD-DFinal D, classification, status, component/PPI/ART contextSeparates the decision signal from context
Safety and provenanceRSB/RST, PTA, final-K checks, source fields, confirmations, versionsPreserves independent constraints and traceability

PDF and Word reports consume the same already-computed canonical report payload; report rendering does not recalculate clinical rules.

Selected sources

  1. CER-AI Clinical Evidence
  2. CER-AI Medical Reference Registry
  3. Corneal ectasia risk assessment overview

See the complete CER-AI medical reference registry for broader context.